Skip to content

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

distinctive

BP loses colour trade mark battle

BP loses colour trade mark battle

15 July 2014
By Kathryn Purcell-Hennessy
Another colour trade mark application filed by BP (this time for the shade Pantone 348C) has rejected by Australia's Trade Marks Office
Read on
Safari Snorkel mark distinctive overall – but is it a pyrrhic victory?

Safari Snorkel mark distinctive overall – but is it a pyrrhic victory?

17 January 2014
By Bill Ladas
In a case involving the rarefied world of air rams and air intake snorkels for vehicles, an opposition against the composite mark below (featuring the words SAFARI SNORKEL) has failed.
Read on

Speciality blogs

  • In Competition
  • IP Whiteboard

More from IP Whiteboard

  • IP Whiteboard

Trending topics

  • Dispute resolution & litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • Litigation
  • Technology
View All Topics

Most viewed

ASIC flexes muscles in scam and phishing takedowns

Read More
Mallesons
©2026 Mallesons
Terms of use & legal notices | Privacy statement

Follow us

  • LinkedIn
Subscribe to Mallesons Pulse
©2026 Mallesons