The recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Bodum AG v H.A.G Import Corpn (Australia) Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 238 illustrates that even deliberate copying of a competitor’s design elements does not necessarily breach the Australian Consumer Law or amount to passing off.
This is a short note to report on a successful interlocutory application seeking a declaration that a patent amendment amounted to an abuse of process.
In The NOCO Company v Brown and Watson International Pty Ltd [2026] FCAFC 44, the Full Court of the Federal Court has affirmed previous decisions that the relevant date for assessing a patentee’s disclosure of the best method under s 40(2)(aa) of the Patents Act 1990 is the date of filing the patent in suit, not any earlier priority or parent document.
We analyse the penalty and extra-curial detriment commentary imposing penalties on Qteq and individual (with no indemnification) for attempted cartel conduct
We explore consumer remediation as an enforcement outcome sought by the ACCC in ACCC v The Good Guys Discount Warehouses (Australia) Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1085.