IP Whiteboard

The misuse of information obtained through an ex-employee’s position: a broader cause of action for businesses

19 June 2026

The Full Court of the Federal Court has held that s 183(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides a standalone cause of action against employees who misuse information obtained through their positions, even where that information does not meet the strict requirements for protection in equity.

Read on

Who owns the lab’s logo? Goodwill, trade marks, and ownership in murky waters: Deakin University v Macreadie [2026] FCA 481

16 June 2026

By Cate Nagy, Megan Fitzgerald, Gina Tran

Does a university own the goodwill and trade marks of an associated research laboratory, when the employee academic who established that laboratory resigns and moves to another university?

Read on

Dark patterns in focus: Privacy Commissioner finds rental tech collection was not fair or reasonably necessary

22 May 2026

By Michael Swinson, Cal Samson, Samantha Gates

The Australian Privacy Commissioner has recently handed down an important determination in Commissioner Initiated Investigation into IRE Pty Ltd (Privacy) [2026] AICmr 24 (the Determination).

Read on

Out with the old, in with the new technology: Privacy Act APP 3 guidance updated for a digital world

22 May 2026

By Michael Swinson, Cal Samson, Samantha Gates

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has released an overhauled set of guidance on the collection of personal information under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act).

Read on

The Treaty on IP, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge has been tabled in Parliament

22 May 2026

By Suzy Madar, Luke Hawthorne, Damien MacRae

Just over a year ago, we wrote about the adoption of the Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge (the Treaty) by 150 members states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and what it could mean for Australia: read our earlier post here.

Read on

Opening the archives: Australia’s new orphan works scheme

29 April 2026

By Cate Nagy, Kelly Williamson, Megan Fitzgerald

In November 2025, the Federal Government introduced the Copyright Amendment Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) which proposed an orphan works scheme for Australia.

Read on

McCallum v Projector Films: moral rights, principal director, and why credits counted

28 April 2026

By Kate Hay, Luke Hawthorne, Jacob Flynn, Ellie Nigro, Sophia Bleakley

Read on

Bad intentions: Can you copy elements of a competitor’s design?

27 April 2026

By Kate Hay, Cate Nagy, Jacob Flynn, Bianca Terlato

The recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Bodum AG v H.A.G Import Corpn (Australia) Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 238 illustrates that even deliberate copying of a competitor’s design elements does not necessarily breach the Australian Consumer Law or amount to passing off.

Read on

Digging too deep: When patent amendments become an abuse of process

24 April 2026

By Kate Hay, Suzy Madar, Sarah Huang

This is a short note to report on a successful interlocutory application seeking a declaration that a patent amendment amounted to an abuse of process.

Read on

Supercharging section 40: Full Court confirms date for assessing best method for divisional patents

17 April 2026

By Matthew Swinn, Danielle Sharplin, Sarah Huang

In The NOCO Company v Brown and Watson International Pty Ltd [2026] FCAFC 44, the Full Court of the Federal Court has affirmed previous decisions that the relevant date for assessing a patentee’s disclosure of the best method under s 40(2)(aa) of the Patents Act 1990 is the date of filing the patent in suit, not any earlier priority or parent document.

Read on

Most recent

The misuse of information obtained through an ex-employee’s position: a broader cause of action for businesses

Who owns the lab’s logo? Goodwill, trade marks, and ownership in murky waters: Deakin University v Macreadie [2026] FCA 481

Dark patterns in focus: Privacy Commissioner finds rental tech collection was not fair or reasonably necessary

Out with the old, in with the new technology: Privacy Act APP 3 guidance updated for a digital world

IP Whiteboard Posts

The misuse of information obtained through an ex-employee’s position: a broader cause of action for businesses

Who owns the lab’s logo? Goodwill, trade marks, and ownership in murky waters: Deakin University v Macreadie [2026] FCA 481

Dark patterns in focus: Privacy Commissioner finds rental tech collection was not fair or reasonably necessary

Out with the old, in with the new technology: Privacy Act APP 3 guidance updated for a digital world

The Treaty on IP, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge has been tabled in Parliament

Opening the archives: Australia’s new orphan works scheme

McCallum v Projector Films: moral rights, principal director, and why credits counted

Bad intentions: Can you copy elements of a competitor’s design?

Digging too deep: When patent amendments become an abuse of process

Supercharging section 40: Full Court confirms date for assessing best method for divisional patents