Skip to content

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

footwear

No surprises? Keds’ side by side two stripe position mark rejected by OHIM’s Board of Appeal

No surprises? Keds’ side by side two stripe position mark rejected by OHIM’s Board of Appeal

5 March 2014
By Bill Ladas
Following hot on the heels (no pun intended!) of the decision of the Federal Court of Australia in adidas v Pacific Brands in Australia last year (in which KWM acted for adidas, here), position and logo marks in the fashion space are really hitting the headlines again in 2014.
Read on

Speciality blogs

  • In Competition
  • IP Whiteboard

More from IP Whiteboard

  • IP Whiteboard

Trending topics

  • Dispute resolution & litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • Litigation
  • Technology
View All Topics

Most viewed

ASIC flexes muscles in scam and phishing takedowns

Read More
Mallesons
©2026 Mallesons
Terms of use & legal notices | Privacy statement

Follow us

  • LinkedIn
Subscribe to Mallesons Pulse
©2026 Mallesons