Skip to content

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

per se prohibition

What’s the score on third line forcing

What’s the score on third line forcing

13 July 2016
By James Gould
Unlike many of Australia’s competition laws, third line forcing is prohibited per se, which means that it is prohibited regardless of its purpose, or effect on competition.
Read on

Speciality blogs

  • In Competition
  • IP Whiteboard

More from In Competition

  • In Competition

Trending topics

  • Dispute resolution & litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • Litigation
  • Technology
View All Topics

Most viewed

Bilateral relations for Australia & China enter a new chapter

Read More

ASIC flexes muscles in scam and phishing takedowns

Read More
Mallesons
©2026 Mallesons
Terms of use & legal notices | Privacy statement

Follow us

  • LinkedIn
Subscribe to Mallesons Pulse
©2026 Mallesons