Skip to content

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

Public Comments

Justice Tracey found there was no Flattery in Seafolly’s bikini designs

Justice Tracey found there was no Flattery in Seafolly’s bikini designs

19 December 2012
By Alex Bruce
We aren’t suggesting Justice Tracey believes Seafolly bikinis are unflattering when worn... We’re referring to his recent Federal Court decision where the designer of “White Sands” swimwear was fined $25,000 for public comments which ‘questioned’ whether Seafolly copied White Sands’ designs.
Read on

Speciality Blogs

  • In Competition
  • International Arbitration
  • IP Whiteboard

More From IP Whiteboard

  • IP Whiteboard

Trending Topics

  • Dispute resolution & litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • Litigation
  • Technology
View All Topics

Most Viewed

Bilateral relations for Australia & China enter a new chapter

Read More

ASIC flexes muscles in scam and phishing takedowns

Read More
Mallesons
©2026 Mallesons

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
Subscribe to Mallesons Pulse
Terms of use & legal notices | Privacy statement
©2026 Mallesons