All Mallesons Pulse Posts

High Court decides important issues relating to patentability of methods of medical treatment, and contributory infringement of pharmaceutical patents

5 December 2013
Further to our earlier “Breaking News” post, the High Court has handed down a much anticipated decision in Apotex v Sanofi-Aventis. The decision is important because it definitely determines that methods of medical treatment of human beings are patentable subject matter within the meaning of s18(1) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth). Further, in circumstances where a pharmaceutical product has more than one use, one which infringes and one which does not infringe a valid patent, the High Court’s decision makes clear that supply of that product will not infringe the patent under s117 of the Patents Act where the infringing use is excluded from the approved indication for that product.
Read on

Naming Your Race Horse – Like registering a trade mark? Well, not quite

26 November 2013
The annual Spring Racing Carnival and running of the Melbourne Cup, can often lead to more than a sore head and fistfuls of losing betting slips. Inspired by the (admittedly rare) example of a $4000 horse winning a Group 1 race, you too might have recently acquired a small stake in a new race horse. Now, it is time to give your foal a name. For the trade mark enthusiasts amongst us, navigating the Registrar of Racehorses ‘Horse Naming Policy’ might remind us of the rigors of the Trade Marks Office. The process is quite similar, but there are differences too.
Read on
Load More Posts