Skip to content

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

Mallesons Pulse Blog

  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Carbon markets
    • Competition & consumer
    • Consumer protection
    • ESG
    • Future energy
    • Hydrogen
    • Inhouse Counsel
    • International Arbitration
    • Intellectual Property
    • Technology
  • Jurisdictions
    • Australia
    • China
    • Hong Kong
    • Singapore
    • Global
  • Specialty Blogs
    • In Competition
    • International Arbitration
    • IP Whiteboard
  • Authors

designs

Bad intentions: Can you copy elements of a competitor’s design?

Bad intentions: Can you copy elements of a competitor’s design?

27 April 2026
By Kate Hay, Cate Nagy, Jacob Flynn, Bianca Terlato
The recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Bodum AG v H.A.G Import Corpn (Australia) Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 238 illustrates that even deliberate copying of a competitor’s design elements does not necessarily breach the Australian Consumer Law or amount to passing off.
Read on
Stop! In the name of interlocutory injunctions: lessons from 2024

Stop! In the name of interlocutory injunctions: lessons from 2024

17 March 2025
By Kate Hay, Jacob Flynn, Yui Fu
Interlocutory injunctions can be a critical tool to help protect intellectual property rights by restraining alleged infringement while a substantive infringement proceeding is run.
Read on
Any comments sofa-r? Government response on Designs consultation

Any comments sofa-r? Government response on Designs consultation

21 November 2019
By Simon Webster
When, in May of 2012, the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (ACIP) was set the mammoth task, the Australian designs system had been operating without review since its inception, some 8 years prior.
Read on
Productivity Commission releases roadmap for IP review and calls for submissions

Productivity Commission releases roadmap for IP review and calls for submissions

15 October 2015
By Bridie Egan
Last week, the Productivity Commission released the Issues Paper in accordance with its comprehensive review of Australia’s IP regime (Inquiry).
Read on
ACIP’s Review of the Designs Systems proposes three approaches to reform

ACIP’s Review of the Designs Systems proposes three approaches to reform

22 January 2015
By Josh Gottlieb
In 2012, the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (ACIP) was tasked by the Government with conducting a review of the operation and effectiveness of the Designs Act 2003 (Cth) in supporting innovation. Late last year, ACIP released its Options Paper on the Designs Act (available online here). The Options Paper proposed three approaches to reform.
Read on

Speciality Blogs

  • In Competition
  • International Arbitration
  • IP Whiteboard

More From IP Whiteboard

  • IP Whiteboard

Trending Topics

  • Dispute resolution & litigation
  • Hong Kong
  • Litigation
  • Technology
View All Topics

Most Viewed

Bilateral relations for Australia & China enter a new chapter

Read More

ASIC flexes muscles in scam and phishing takedowns

Read More
Mallesons
©2026 Mallesons

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
Subscribe to Mallesons Pulse
Terms of use & legal notices | Privacy statement
©2026 Mallesons